D'oh No.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d714/8d71462598cc38bcbddd265421eff99e5e1a8b66" alt=""
It is slow. It is flaccid. The writing is gentle, not edgy. The characters are softened to the point of blandness. It just doesn't work. I really wish it did. Did I mention I love the Simpsons?
And whatever jokes might have worked have been given away by a reckless marketing department. There is hardly a punchline you haven't already seen.
I'm depressed.
12:34 AM
I actually rather liked it. I find it difficult to dislike a movie that opens by warning you that you may be wasting your money. I would agree, though, that it probably wasn't up to the standards of the best Simpsons episodes.
7:49 AM
It just didn't work for me. But tastes vary. Will you agree though that the marketing had given away at least half the punchlines?
4:02 PM
Have you seen Ratatouille? Because that movie was, like, made for you, dude.
7:56 PM
I guess I didn't see that much advertising for the movie--my habits tend to protect me from ads. I think I saw one trailer, and knew the rock/hard place gag in advance, but it still caught me off guard, because I didn't know what context it would appear in.
7:13 PM
I laughed a lot in the first half or two-thirds (I hadn't seen much of the promo material for it) but once they got to Alaska the wrapping-up of the plot took over and the movie became a routine save-the-world, can-you-top-this-effect, would-be-thriller, which is an odd thing for a Simpsons movie to be.