<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d32209663\x26blogName\x3dSideways+Mencken\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLACK\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://sidewaysmencken.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://sidewaysmencken.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d2412354670652716332', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

End Game Begins

According to my always shaky grasp of higher math we have 30 days left until election day.  Give or take.

Can John McCain still somehow win this thing?  Yes.  Maybe.  In theory.  But it would be tough. RealClearPolitics.com has Obama with 260 electoral votes.  9 more throws it to the House.  10 more is win for Obama.

If those numbers are accurate, Obama can win with just Ohio.  Or just Florida.  Or just Indiana, just Missouri, just Virginia or just North Carolina.  Or he can win with Colorado and New Hampshire.  Or Colorado and Nevada.  So many ways to win.  He could hold onto what he has, move out of every other battleground state and throw all his resources into just, say, Virginia, and he'd win.

RCP has McCain at 163.  He pretty much has to run the table.  

If you were playing poker you'd want to be holding Obama's cards.   He's got three jacks.  McCain has a pair of twos.  Obama has so many ways to win, and McCain has so many ways to lose.

McCain has almost no choice now but to go even deeper into the gutter.  He has to try and do to Obama what George W. Bush did to McCain in 2000.  McCain 1.0 wouldn't have gone there. But McCain 2.0 -- The Creature That Ate John McCain -- will go for it.

The next 30 days will likely be unpleasant.  But it will be hard to change the math.  We've already seen so much Republican mud that I suspect the voters are inured to it.  And McCain faces the dilemma of the next debate.  Having hurt himself by coming across in the first debate as angry and contemptuous, he either has to stay the angry course, or try and convince the voters he finally took his prunes and come off as less hostile.

Here's the problem:  a nasty debate McCain would mesh with a mudslide attack but reinforce the voter's sense that he's maybe too much of a dick to spend four years with.  While a nice-guy debate McCain would seem hypocritical if he's simultaneously running Rove-style ads.

Tough to square that circle.  My prediction is that we get an air-war mudslide from McCain and his 527's on the one hand, and the terse gritting-my-teeth-trying-to-be-civil McCain at the debate.  I don't think that's going to work.  I think it will come off as phony and desperate.

McCain will attack, Obama will respond but in more measured tones.  McCain will try one more desperate gamble, if he can come up with one.  But I sense that the country, while it has not decided to vote for Obama, has decided not to vote for McCain.

“End Game Begins”

  1. Anonymous Anonymous Says:

    Using your poker logic, McCain still has a chance to win the game. Let's assume in addition to the three jacks, Obama pulls the other pair of twos. Obama now has a "full house", usually a winning hand. But McCain has already shown he's not afraid to use a Joker as a wild card (Palin selection, campaign suspension). So I would not be surprised if McCain pulls three more Jokers out of his sleeve and declares himself the winner. After all "five of a kind" has to beat a "full house". Right?

  2. Blogger Michael Reynolds Says:

    I knew I should stay away from poker metaphors. Or at least have consulted with Alan Stewart Carl who, unlike me, actually undersatands the game.

  3. Blogger Alan Stewart Carl Says:

    Since my name was invoked ....

    In my mind, Obama has a made straight. McCain is drawing two to the flush. As long as blanks hit, Obama wins. But McCain has just enough to deliver a runner-runner bad beat.

    I like Obama's chances.

  4. Blogger kreiz1 Says:

    Chuck Todd hit it right this morning. McCain's got two more debates- then a couple of weeks to election day. That's his best shot at altering the race's trajectory. After that, nothing much will change much. I don't see it happening. It's over. And it pisses Mac off.

    MR, I prefer sports analogies to cards, although I'm certain poker was a 2008 Summer Olympic event- right alongside of ping pong & darts. The truth is that sports analogies are overused and lame. I can't even make the ol' Hail Mary reference. Lame-O.

  5. Blogger Michael Reynolds Says:

    It's like McCain has two outs with 20 yards to go and only two seconds left on the shot clock. Right? And then he bogies the match point.

  6. Anonymous Anonymous Says:

    Count how many times after the debate a pundit will say their candidate "hit it out of the park".

    I must have heard this a dozen times about Palin's debate performance. What they left out was the park she was playing in was Little League. If we were talking Major Leagues, then the best she could hope for was a walk, as Biden clearly gave her a free pass.

  7. Blogger Peter Hoh Says:

    It's not just that the campaign is getting nasty, but the McCain team is setting up so that his supporters can feel victimized when he loses.